Tracking in-readtable forms and passing the readtable designator along in evaluation/compilation requests sounds consensual. Let's start with that, what do you think? 

Cheers,
Luís 

On Fri, Aug 18, 2017, 17:15 73budden . <budden73@gmail.com> wrote:
Good idea, but this PR does not implement my current suggestion. I
have to work on code for a while. Before I start, I'd like to know do
you (or does anyone) see any more issues with the solution described?

2017-08-18 16:39 GMT+03:00, Luís Oliveira <luismbo@gmail.com>:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:03 PM, 73budden . <budden73@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry, I didn't get what you meant :) Anyway, the quesion is still
>> open if the change suggested would break someone's things, so I hope
>> it is not a big harm to give more details.
>
> I suggest we move on to pull request #278 then. Maybe you can start by
> rebasing/merging against latest master?
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Luís Oliveira
> http://kerno.org/~luis/
>