See below...
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [slime-devel] slime repl AND slime-fancy vs. XEmacs From: Tobias C. Rittweiler tcr@freebits.de To: slime-devel@common-lisp.net Date: Tue Nov 17 2009 04:00:31 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
"Mark H. David" mhd@yv.org writes: ...
If I'm at all close to right, I would still like to see it there on that main installation doc page. Couldn't it shown as an example along with explaining that it's a "contrib", but it's the most commonly used one, and then sending them off to the contrib doc for extra information? That's what I'd like to see.
It should say that people typically want to enable the slime-fancy meta contrib because the default configuation is very minimalistic.
That sounds good.
(I don't know what "main installation doc page" refers to. It's the README file? If not, the README file should be changed, too.)
It's the doc reachable from here:
http://common-lisp.net/project/slime/
That's an HTML link --
http://common-lisp.net/project/slime/doc/html/
and a PDF link --
http://common-lisp.net/project/slime/doc/slime.pdf
Of course, the README and doc/slime.texi must be changed, too.
I'll happily apply a patch from you along Madhu's patch. It's the way to improve the situation.
-T.
slime-devel site list slime-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel