Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
Raymond Toy toy.raymond@gmail.com writes:
I'm attaching the message for a slime internal bug. I think the issue is that slime doesn't recognize reader conditionals like #+:executable. In fact, changing slime-reader-conditionals-regexp to (regexp-opt '("#+" "#-" "#!+" "#!-" "#+:" "#-:"))) fixes this issue. But perhaps the bug is in slime-search-suppressed-forms? Changing #+:executable to #+executable (and #-: to #-) makes slime handle the file.
The file I was looking at was src/code/save.lisp from cmucl.
There's no such problem with GNU Emacs 23. Others repeatedly reported problems with XEmacs, so I just tried it, and I can confirm it.
The reason is that font-lock of XEmacs does not seem to provide a way to extend the region that's currently being fontified. I think we could kludge that in manually. Perhaps I'll do it when I'll find the time.
Yes, sorry for the noise. I found out late yesterday that the problem was the font-lock region was not large enough for the end of the conditional.
XEmacs allows using a replacement function for font-lock (I use lazy-shot). Perhaps slime can hook into that by defining its own function that extends the region and calling the underlying font-lock function? I'll try to look into this...
Ray