28 Nov
2003
28 Nov
'03
9:27 a.m.
Nicolas Neuss Nicolas.Neuss@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de writes:
I would have preferred the option of LEP being supported by the free Lisp implementations (CMUCL, SBCL, CLISP, GCL).
David Lichteblau is working on this for SBCL. He shares code with SLIME, since Dan is factoring all the SBCL-deep-magic code into the SB-INTROSPECT library that we both use.
His LEP-for-SBCL is at http://www.lichteblau.com/src.html
Is LEP too complicated or otherwise bad, so that SLIME became necessary?
Absolutely not.