Brian Mastenbrook bmastenb@cs.indiana.edu writes:
I don't see why not - if we make the assumption of a shared directory, possibly with different mountpoints, then what's the difference from Emacs' perspective between a local lisp and an ssh-tunneled lisp? This way I can test my code on CMUCL (I'm on OS X) from my pretty local Emacs.
Ah, that's the reason.
I just think that this remote setup is difficult to make work properly and will require complexity for little or no benefit. The main problems I see:
- filenames for files to compile and for M-. and xref etc. - signals. Currently we send SIGINT to interrupt the Lisp. - security.
Of course, if this is important to you and you have patches for this, let's include them.
Helmut.