On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 03:37 +0000, Juho Snellman wrote:
dlw@itasoftware.com wrote:
On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 18:57 +0100, Marco Baringer wrote:
what do people think about a varient of slime-compile-defun which wrapped the code in
(locally (declaim (optimize (speed 0) (safety 3) (debug 3))) ,@form)
[...]
It would be a good idea if these settings actually worked in SBCL, instead of (sometimes) making the compiler bomb out :(
They will be more likely to work in SBCL if any such problems are reported to SBCL developers, preferably with a failing test case.
I did report it to our local SBCL maintainer. It would be extremely difficult to send a reproducible test case to anyone external since the test case was a recompile of our entire software base. I could send just a stack trace, if that would help.