2 Aug
2008
2 Aug
'08
12:22 a.m.
* Tobias C. Rittweiler [2008-08-01 23:04+0200] writes:
How would you be going to implement this?
a) We could grovel all buffers, and just reset slime-buffer-connection if appropriate.
b) Slime-connections are network processes. We could add a level of indirection (putting the process in a struct, say), and make connections reconnectable this way.
The first option is probably simpler, while the latter may be cleaner. FSVO "cleaner", anyway.
What do you think?
I'd use a) rather than b) as the latter requires lots of changes. But rather than a) I would not bother with "fixing" temporary buffers. It's easy enough to close those buffers with 'q' and it's also easy to recreate them by invoking the respective command.
Helmut.