14 May
2018
14 May
'18
5:21 p.m.
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:23 PM Stelian Ionescu sionescu@cddr.org wrote:
Maybe you don't necessarily need to change the licence of existing code. Just like with the legacy code from Spice Lisp and CMUCL which was public domain, it should be enough to state that the licence for new code is MIT
and
over time the code base would become a mixture, just like SBCL. I guess
this
should be ok to appease lawyers.
I wouldn't have a problem with that. Would it help, Red?
--
Luís Oliveira
http://kerno.org/~luis/