Helmut Eller <e9626484@stud3.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
Travis Cross <travis@crosswirecorp.com> writes:
Is there a reason that slime-conservative-indentation defaults to t (or any disadvantage to setting this to nil)?
If you have written some code without SLIME and you edit it now with SLIME there's a chance that some macros will be indented differently. This might be annoying ... or not. It certainly annoyed me for some time, but now I just set the 'common-lisp-indent-function properties in my .emacs. That's more predictable than relying on SLIME or def* heuristics.
As slime-conservative-indentation seems to be a commons source of confusion, I will change the default to t.
Isn't it already t. And isn't that the source of the confusion? Or is it just me who's confused? -Peter -- Peter Seibel peter@javamonkey.com Lisp is the red pill. -- John Fraser, comp.lang.lisp