11 Sep
2008
11 Sep
'08
6:44 p.m.
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:20:39 -0400, Gary King said:
I don't follow OpenMCL / CCL or Lispworks closely so maybe their is no longer a need to differentiate between 64-bit and non-64-bit fasls. If there is, then shouldn't the definition of lisp-version-string look more like the one below?
Why associate this with the version string rather than the arch string?
LispWorks doesn't need it to keep the fasls separate, because they use different extensions, though it won't do any harm.
__Martin