On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 03:58:45PM +0200, Luke Gorrie wrote:
If the ALU can do it then so can we :-). It would be nice to get some feedback to understand which backends are getting the most/least usage and which ones are flaky.
So if you are an active SLIME user and you have a moment then please reply to this mail (send the reply to the list).
Questions:
Which Lisp versions do you use SLIME with?
cmucl
Which Emacs versions?
emacs 21.2.1, rh rpm
How well does SLIME work for you?
much more useful than ilisp. especially the remote connections and multiple connections.
What bugs (reproducible or otherwise) or missing features annoy you?
no problems aside from the swank-backend (patched) and the "bad file descriptor" (fixed),
Is there some packaging system (e.g. Debian) that you would like to see SLIME 1.0 bundled with? If so, do you know how to coordinate this?
rpm. i packaged the cvs myself. you can have the spec file if you want it.
If you said anything negative above then please say something nice here to make us feel good:
very useful. nice tight UI.