Hi, Ariel Badichi <abadichi@bezeqint.net> writes:
Hello,
"Bill Clementson" <billclem@gmail.com> writes:
"Bill Clementson" <billclem@gmail.com> writes:
I have updated to SLIME 2007-01-20 and when I press C-h k C-M-q I see that C-M-q is bound to indent-sexp. I don't remember it being bound to anything else (but I may be wrong). Ariel, are you saying that C-M-q is not bound to anything or that it has the wrong binding?
I compared two slime.el-files: one quite old with C-M-q active in *slime-scratch* and the current one. Now, the old creation of the keymap for that buffer used lisp-mode-map: (defvar slime-scratch-mode-map) (setq slime-scratch-mode-map (make-sparse-keymap)) (set-keymap-parent slime-scratch-mode-map lisp-mode-map) whereas the new creation uses slime-mode-map: (defvar slime-scratch-mode-map (let ((map (make-sparse-keymap))) (set-keymap-parent map slime-mode-map) map)) and slime-define-keys does not create a binding for indent-sexp. Is this the correct analysis? I am not very familiar with slime.el. Regards, Stefan PS: As for the differences in C-h k C-M-q and C-h m: I have seen this in the past but never searched for the reason since I happen to use C-h m only very rarely. I seem to remember that I also saw keybindings in menu entries which were not correct. PPS: Ah, and this is speaking for XEmacs/Gentoo Linux/CVS HEAD Slime -- Stefan Kamphausen --- http://www.skamphausen.de a blessed +42 regexp of confusion (weapon in hand) You hit. The format string crumbles and turns to dust.