Hi,
Ariel Badichi abadichi@bezeqint.net writes:
Hello,
"Bill Clementson" billclem@gmail.com writes:
"Bill Clementson" billclem@gmail.com writes:
I have updated to SLIME 2007-01-20 and when I press C-h k C-M-q I see that C-M-q is bound to indent-sexp. I don't remember it being bound to anything else (but I may be wrong). Ariel, are you saying that C-M-q is not bound to anything or that it has the wrong binding?
I compared two slime.el-files: one quite old with C-M-q active in *slime-scratch* and the current one.
Now, the old creation of the keymap for that buffer used lisp-mode-map:
(defvar slime-scratch-mode-map) (setq slime-scratch-mode-map (make-sparse-keymap)) (set-keymap-parent slime-scratch-mode-map lisp-mode-map)
whereas the new creation uses slime-mode-map:
(defvar slime-scratch-mode-map (let ((map (make-sparse-keymap))) (set-keymap-parent map slime-mode-map) map))
and slime-define-keys does not create a binding for indent-sexp.
Is this the correct analysis? I am not very familiar with slime.el.
Regards, Stefan
PS: As for the differences in C-h k C-M-q and C-h m: I have seen this in the past but never searched for the reason since I happen to use C-h m only very rarely. I seem to remember that I also saw keybindings in menu entries which were not correct.
PPS: Ah, and this is speaking for XEmacs/Gentoo Linux/CVS HEAD Slime