data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62784/627842d5c511c1d11902582e3970228e74961fb2" alt=""
Harald Hanche-Olsen <hanche@math.ntnu.no> writes:
+ Michael Livshin <gmane@cmm.kakpryg.net>:
| <example> | (defmacro my-macro (name (&rest args) &body function-bindings) | ...)
Uh, am I missing something here, or is that an inappropriate use of &body? I would use &rest in this situation. Why don't you?
because with &REST Emacs would indent the bindings waaaay to the right (unless I put the name and args on a separate line, which is also not really plesant), so I've sort of grown used to use &BODY in such cases.
It's just that my gut reaction says that a list of function bindings is not a body, and so saying it is one seems disingenuous.
I think your gut reaction is right, if one is willing to discount the present realities of using Emacs and Slime. thanks, --m