Lynn Quam writes:
Helmut Eller wrote:
Eduardo Muñoz emufer@terra.es writes:
LispWorks has a low args limit for apply. The following patch (inlined below) avoids landing on sldb when inspecting long lists. I think that its safe to #'nconc (nreverse ... but there isnt a noticeable change of speed or consing so it may be more conservative to just use reduce.
Fixed now. Thanks for the note.
Helmut.
It would be nice if there was some better control of the printing of arrays. *PRINT-ARRAY* allow for arrays to always be printed or never be printed. What would be useful is a variable *PRINT-ARRAY-SIZE* that says to print arrays whose number of elements is less than or equal to *PRINT-ARRAY-SIZE* and *PRINT-ARRAY* in non-NIL. (I seem to recall that the Lisp Machines had such a variable, but I cannot recall its exact name.)
Can't *print-length* be used?