17 Dec
2004
17 Dec
'04
12:39 p.m.
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 06:09:57 -0600, Chris Capel <pdf23ds@gmail.com> wrote:
Shouldn't &rest be treated like &body as far as macroindentation is concerned?
3.4.4 of the CLHS says: "&body is identical in function to &rest, but it can be used to inform certain output-formatting and editing functions that the remainder of the form is treated as a body, and should be indented accordingly." So, to me it looks like the only reason that &BODY exists is that it should /not/ be treated like &REST as far as indentation is concerned. Cheers, Edi.