23 May
2011
23 May
'11
12:25 p.m.
On Sun, 22 May 2011 06:20:39 -0400, Helmut Eller heller@common-lisp.net wrote:
Sounds reasonable. Maybe we should rename the first event and call it (swank:configure :version "20110501"). Possibly adding more parameters, like :encoding, in the future. Would that be OK?
Sounds good to me. Having an explicit encoding parameter sounds like it could help flag encoding mismatch issues.
--
Hugo Duncan