
17 Apr
2007
17 Apr
'07
7:41 p.m.
Yoni Rabkin Katzenell <yoni-r@actcom.com> writes:
C-c C-k takes the value of slime-display-compilation-output into account. I wanted the same to be true of C-M-x so I changed slime-eval-with-transcript:
[...]
Is there a simpler way to get the same result?
The question is why do you want in the first place? `C-M-x' will _evaluate_ the current toplevel form; if your implementation happens to compile everything by default, then that's not SLIME's business. But you can still be helped :), do you know about `C-c C-c'? Which I think will probably do exactly what you want, won't it? -T.