13 Mar
2005
13 Mar
'05
11:43 a.m.
Antonio Menezes Leitao <aml@gia.ist.utl.pt> writes:
... and I wonder if the macroexpand could bind *print-circle* to nil so that the macroexpansion command does not show a sexp full of #n= and #n# that I find harder to understand. OTOH, it allows us to see structure sharing in the code but that doesn't seem to be terribly useful...
You can do something like this: (setf (cdr (assoc '*print-circle* swank:*swank-pprint-bindings*)) nil) I haven't noticed #n# problems with CMUCL but I don't macroexpand all that often.