8 Apr
2015
8 Apr
'15
8:56 p.m.
On Fri, May 10 2013, Marco Baringer wrote:
anyway, that's already way too many words, i don't want to have a long drawn out back and forth about it; i will introduce a slime-sexp-at-point-function variable and i'll rewrite the patch to use that.
It would be easier is to make a different command, say slime-repl-inspect, and bind it to the key where slime-inspect was.
Helmut