
23 Feb
2008
23 Feb
'08
10:09 a.m.
* Nikodemus Siivola [2008-02-20 15:33+0100] writes:
Reasons I did not merge this straightaway:
* The waiting is not terribly elegant.
* It would be a lot better if Slime started by SLIME-CONNECTION like this didn't rearrange windows the way it now does.
I committed it. I used sleep-for instead of sit-for which seems to avoid most of the window rearrangement clutter. Maybe we find a more elegant solution in the future. Perhaps slime-lisp-implementations could be extended so that it just connects to some port without starting a subprocess. Helmut.