1 Dec
2008
1 Dec
'08
2:15 p.m.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Helmut Eller heller@common-lisp.net wrote:
A problem is of course the very unfriendly session management of SBCL's debugger. E.g. it doesn't even print a message that the debugger is waiting for the session. It's also a bit pointless that the debugged thread needs a terminal session when it doesn't even access the terminal. That's the case when the debugger does all I/O over SLIME's streams.
Agreed. I would really like to rip the session stuff out and replace it with stream based synchronization. I don't remember what it was that stopped me the last time I was looking at it.
Cheers,
-- Nikodemus