Hi,
I'm new on this list. I don't know if the following problem was already reported.
With Linux 2.6 (x86-32), SBCL 0.9.13 and Slime CVS (from today), I get the error below.
Is there a compatibility problem between SBCL and Slime in this case ? (SBCL release vs Slime CVS)
error while parsing arguments to DESTRUCTURING-BIND: invalid number of elements in ((1545 . 2005) (1988 . 2003) (1660 . 1950)) to satisfy lambda list ((SWANK-BACKEND::START . SWANK-BACKEND::END)): exactly 1 expected, but 3 found [Condition of type SB-KERNEL::ARG-COUNT-ERROR]
Restarts: 0: [RETRY] Retry performing #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL {B1A5C69}> on #<IRONCLAD-SYSTEM::IRONCLAD-SOURCE-FILE "common" {C51DBF1}>. 1: [ACCEPT] Continue, treating #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP NIL {B1A5C69}> on #<IRONCLAD-SYSTEM::IRONCLAD-SOURCE-FILE "common" {C51DBF1}> as having been successful. 2: [ABORT] Abort SLIME compilation. 3: [ABORT-REQUEST] Abort handling SLIME request. 4: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level.
Backtrace: 0: (SWANK-BACKEND::SOURCE-PATH-SOURCE-POSITION (0 1 3 4) NIL #<HASH-TABLE :TEST EQ :COUNT 31 {BCB2321}>) 1: (SWANK-BACKEND::SOURCE-PATH-FILE-POSITION (7 1 3 4) #P"/usr/share/common-lisp/source/ironclad/common.lisp") 2: (SWANK-BACKEND::LOCATE-COMPILER-NOTE #P"/usr/share/common-lisp/source/ironclad/common.lisp" (7 1 3 4) " (LDB (BYTE 8 0) IRONCLAD::UB)") 3: (SWANK-BACKEND::COMPILER-NOTE-LOCATION #<SB-C::COMPILER-ERROR-CONTEXT >) 4: (SWANK-BACKEND::SIGNAL-COMPILER-CONDITION #<SB-INT:SIMPLE-COMPILER-NOTE {BCA1AB9}> #<SB-C::COMPILER-ERROR-CONTEXT >) 5: (SWANK-BACKEND::HANDLE-NOTIFICATION-CONDITION #<SB-INT:SIMPLE-COMPILER-NOTE {BCA1AB9}>) 6: (SIGNAL #<SB-INT:SIMPLE-COMPILER-NOTE {BCA1AB9}>) [..]