11 Aug
2009
11 Aug
'09
5:09 p.m.
Helmut Eller heller@common-lisp.net writes:
- Carlos Konstanski [2009-08-11 17:39+0200] writes:
Just a thought... maybe try compiling emacs 23 without xft support (if that is an option on a Mac).
Running Emacs in a terminal with emacs -nw is probably easier than recompiling.
I tried emacs -nw and Slime compilation went back to its usual snappiness. I also tried recompiling the package without xft, but that did not make a difference.
--
Regards, (concatenate
Constantine Vetoshev 'string (mapcar #'code-char
(reverse '(109 111 99 46 108 105 97
109 103 64 118 99 100 114 97 112 101 103))))