"Tobias C. Rittweiler" <tcr@freebits.de> writes:
Helmut Eller <heller@common-lisp.net> writes:
* trittweiler [2007-08-15 15:45+0200] writes:
* slime.el (slime-narrowing-configuration, slime-emacs-snapshot), (current-slime-narrowing-configuration), (set-slime-narrowing-configuration), (current-slime-emacs-snapshot), (set-slime-emacs-snapshot), (current-slime-emacs-snapshot-fingerprint): New. Emacs' window configurations do not restore narrowing, so introduce a snapshot facility that contains the necessary information.
This is quite a heavy abstraction. Can we at least agree to use "slime" as prefix in ELisp code please?
It's based upon `current-window-configuration' and `set-window-configuration' --- I wasn't quite sure if I should name them this way or the way you suggest (actually I'd have liked to drop the slime part alltogether.)
I don't want to comment on the rest of the naming or design of these functions, but using the package prefix "slime-" is an important Emacs convention that should not be violated. Please fix that. Matthias -- Matthias Koeppe -- http://www.math.uni-magdeburg.de/~mkoeppe (currently @math.ucdavis.edu)