+ Samium Gromoff _deepfire@feelingofgreen.ru:
| While figuring out how to deal with unicode i stumbled upon across | something which appeared to be killing slime session/sbcl with an ensuing | emacs message telling something about process filters. | | Urfin from #lisp helped me to narrow this down to evaluation of | (format t "~c" #\UD0BB), or otherwise getting #\UD0BB shown on the screen, | like having it displayed as the result of evaluation. | | It seems to have a 100% repeatability.
Does it apply only to this magical value (which would be strange indeed), or to any other character for which emacs cannot find a glyph?
| I have yesterday's slime and sbcl 1.0/x86/Linux.
FWIW, I can't reproduce this with today's slime and sbcl 1.0.1.33/ppc/MacOS X.
I don't use slime-net-coding-system, but instead have
(setf slime-lisp-implementations '((sbcl ("sbcl") :coding-system utf-8-unix) (cmucl ("cmucl") :coding-system iso-latin-1-unix)))
However I believe the effect should be the same, so this comment is probably irrelevant.
- Harald