* Tobias C. Rittweiler [2010-04-21 17:14+0200] writes:
Helmut Eller heller@common-lisp.net writes:
- Tobias C. Rittweiler [2010-04-20 10:52+0200] writes:
Slime does not currently have a consistent scheme on namings its buffers.
There's
*slime-repl ...*
*sldb...*
*SLIME ...*
*Slime ...*
I think at least the last two should be coalesced.
Probably by introducing a function `slime-buffer-name' which can be used like (slime-buffer-name :compilation) or (slime-buffer-name :inspector) and which will produce the actual buffer names in whatever scheme we like best.
Any problem with that?
Well, people will start looking up buffers by name which is not a good idea and should be discouraged.
So you use the slime-selector extensively? I'm still looking for a good place for it on qwertz. Where do you have it?
C-c s
Helmut