4 Dec
2003
4 Dec
'03
12:10 p.m.
Luke Gorrie luke@bluetail.com writes:
Now we've also added a command that goes to the next definition (like M-, in etags) on `C-M-.'.
Hmm, well, etags has C-M-. as `find-tag-regexp'. Conceivably we could do a command like that too.
Whaddayareckon, can we push through a rebellion against etags bindings, or is resistance futile (and annoying)?