Helmut Eller heller@common-lisp.net writes:
evaluate-in-emacs was redundant because there is already a swank:eval-in-emacs resp. slime-eval-for-lisp.
Thanks for the explanation.
The "security" switch sounds a bit academic/useless to me, but I don't mind if you add one.
Done. I hope you don't mind that I made it secure by default, as no SLIME functionality depends on it.