Re: [slime-devel] security and presentations

Helmut Eller <heller@common-lisp.net> writes:

evaluate-in-emacs was redundant because there is already a swank:eval-in-emacs resp. slime-eval-for-lisp.

Thanks for the explanation.

The "security" switch sounds a bit academic/useless to me, but I don't mind if you add one.

Done. I hope you don't mind that I made it secure by default, as no SLIME functionality depends on it. -- Matthias Köppe -- http://www.math.uni-magdeburg.de/~mkoeppe