On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 18:17:33 +0200, marco mb@bese.it said:
Marco> i just changed the swank inspector api. inspect-for-emacs (ex Marco> inspected-parts) now takes a second argument which is an inspector Marco> object. this means that we get implementation specific inspectors Marco> where available and default generic inspectors otherwise and clears up Marco> the load order issues i was having.
Marco> i went and re-wrote all the implementation inspector methods to use Marco> the new return-value format (previously those methods were being Marco> ignored so the issue never came up). HOWEVER: I also made these Marco> changes for allegro and lispworks, even though i don't have neither an Marco> allegro nor a lispworks to test the changes on. i may very well have Marco> b0rken things.
No problems, it seems to be working in LispWorks. I'm not sure that the getter and setter functions should be returned though, because they are part of the inspector, not part of the object.
BTW, is there an intentional change to the working practice for commit messages in slime? I see that you use the whole ChangeLog entry in every file, rather than just the paragraph that describes the changes in that file (without the prefix).
__Martin