27 Jun
2009
27 Jun
'09
3:26 p.m.
* Tobias C. Rittweiler [2009-06-27 17:15+0200] writes:
Helmut Eller heller@common-lisp.net writes:
- Nikodemus Siivola [2009-06-26 23:19+0200] writes:
Normally I would just commit this, but given therecent work on slime-symbol I was not sure if could be controversial?
Looks fine to me. I committed, it along with some tests.
I'd prefer an implementation involving query-replace-regexp and _<THE-SYMBOL-NAME_> because it involves the query-replace machinery and its goodies.
Are we talking about slime-symbol-at-point or Nikodemus' symbol rename code? If the latter then I agree: query-replace-regexp seems worth using. If the former then I don't understand what you mean.
Helmut