9 Oct
2014
9 Oct
'14
8:44 a.m.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com> wrote:
That's OK with me. Though, I consider the swank/FOO packages internal interfaces that are needed to implement SWANK but are not an API for third party code.
Cool, I'll add that in along with a pointer to Conium (it being an alternative that actually purports to provide a stable API) in the NEWS file. Xach, if I send you a tarball with a pre-release, can you test it against the Quicklisp world? -- Luís Oliveira http://kerno.org/~luis/