Red,
No objections whatsoever. I like Fiasco, FiveAM and RT, but feel free to suggest something else. swank/tests/*.lisp seems like the obvious spot, even though we have a couple of Scheme implementations of swank. The swank/tests system can live inside swank.asd perhaps.
What do you think? Feel free to suggest an alternative layout or test framework.
Cheers, Luís
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, 04:57 Red Daly reddaly@gmail.com wrote:
I'm modifying swank-c-p-c.lisp to complete "c:m-v-b" to cl:multiple-value-bind, and I would like to add a few unit tests for the swank-c-p-c code. There are only .el tests as of now, so perhaps there are opinions about including Common Lisp tests in the project.
Are there any objections to adding Common Lisp tests?
If so, does anyone have preferences for CL tests? (e.g., choice of library, file layout)