4 Oct
2004
4 Oct
'04
12:38 p.m.
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 08:13:31AM -0700, Peter Seibel wrote:
But I *do* like the idea of including the implementation name in the buffer name.
Probably better to have a generic "session name" variable instead of hard-coding it to just the implementation name. That way you could tell apart your "webserver", "CLIM", and "scratch" SBCL sessions. (To me, the purpose of the session is more useful information than the implementation that it's running.)
Obviously it could default to the implementation type, or whatever else is deemed useful.
-bcd