Lunedì, 23 feb 2004, alle 11:18 Europe/Rome, lawrence mitchell ha scritto:
Not really. The only problem I see with this is that one would presumably also add this binding to SWANK-PPRINT. Which may well have unwanted side-effects elsewhere, in that, in order to have non-pprinted arglists, one also has to have non-pprinted results from PPRINT-EVAL. If, however, you weren't intending this, then I see no reason why one couldn't change things.
i think swank-pprint should bind print-pretty to t, no matter what the value of *swank-pprint-pretty* is (it's called pprint after all).
i think it woud be quite fair to say that all slime output is controlled by one set of variables, if you want functions args to not be pprint'd it's reasonable to assume you wouldn't want anything else to be pprint'd either.
-- Marco Ring the bells that still can ring. Forget the perfect offering. There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in. -Leonard Cohen