On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 7:26 PM, Madhu enometh@meer.net wrote:
- "Tobias C. Rittweiler" 87r5srbax3.fsf@freebits.de :
Wrote on Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:12:08 +0100:
I'm not sure what youre asking, perhaps the flaw is in the way restarts were designed by the writers of the framework, who probably gave no thought to the issue and you are changing slime to fit that flawed view of the world.
I have not used those frameworks or looked at those tests.
-- Madhu
It's really weird to read this discussion.
You seem to be so sure about how others use slime/lisp (what they like or dislike) by extrapolating your own usage scenarios. Why don't you put a variable there? Then both of you will be ok, and others can also choose according to their own preference. Keep the old behavior as default, and it's done.
And if we are at it, why does SLDB give a number for restarts which do already have a 1 keystroke keybinding? q, a, c could just be written in place of the numbers, and those numbers could be saved for other restarts... but this would be my personal taste and I'm sure you can find arguments in your taste against it.
levy