Quoth Stas Boukarev stassats@gmail.com:
You are right. I was annoyed by this before, but didn't pay attention. Should be fixed in CVS.
I've since realised that I was using a *very* old slime so it's _possible_ that the change you made wasn't necessary.
Sincere apologies for the confusion.
Anyway, the fix (if, in fact, something was broken) doesn't seem to have introduced any new bugs.
A quick question... any reason why sldb-print-condition is commented out in the source?
I only discovered it recently (after cobbling together my own kludge that did something similar) and find it very useful. It doesn't seem to cause any problems as far as I can tell (and there's nothing in the changelog about it).
Regards,
Seb