...but it seems really fragile to me. is there not somethnig else we can do?
I saw someone trying to shadow standard defmacro with its own version: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_thread/thread/dff827eeb 21412d4/cc2a69182c2734a#cc2a69182c2734a
Another way is to implement needed functionality in clisp.
Maybe something else...
-----Original Message----- From: Marco Baringer [mailto:mb@bese.it] Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 7:43 AM To: Vodonosov Anton Subject: Re: arglist for macros in clisp
"Vodonosov Anton" vodonosov@mail.ru writes:
Of course, this solution is implementation-tied, treats &rest and &body parameters equally and works only for interpreted code. But it works
(seems
to be).
the fact that it's implementation tied is not a problem (it is swank-CLISP.lisp after all), but it seems really fragile to me. is there not somethnig else we can do?
-- -Marco Ring the bells that still can ring. Forget your perfect offering. There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in. -Leonard Cohen