* Taylor Campbell [2005-09-29 05:39+0200] writes:
I was almost convinced earlier today not to fork SLIME, as everyone who responded to my poll (about five or six people) was opposed to it, and I didn't want the maintenance burden of a SLIME fork; I was about to send mail to this regard a few minutes ago, until I received the ChangeLog diff showing numerous changes to the SLIME48 code that were made without my knowledge, that I was not sent or even contacted about before they were committed, that were inconsiderate of Scheme & Scheme48's style & design, that were committed even before I got CVS access, and that were made without regard to the separate Darcs repository that I was maintaining. I was under the impression, too, that the general attitude was that burden of SLIME48's maintenance should *not* be placed on the existing SLIME maintainers.
First, I asked the cl.net guys to give you permissions a week ago. Maybe you should have said a word to me that you still haven't received your password.
Second, if you don't like my changes, feel free to fix them.
I am sorry to those who would have preferred no fork, and I apologize for the bother taken to put SLIME48 in SLIME's CVS, but under the circumstances and in consideration of the possible advantages that more freedom from the current SLIME development might allow, I'd rather fork SLIME.
Well, it's your decision.