Zach Beane xach@xach.com writes:
joaotavora@gmail.com (João Távora) writes:
Helmut Eller eller.helmut@gmail.com writes:
Yes, I do: please use something different than Slime and Swank as part of symbol names, package names, or file names.
Sorry, no, unless you provide an argument.
I'd like to be able to load both of them at the same time without conflicts.
OK, that is an argument.
I see SLIME as an application/tool, not as a library, so it doens't make any sense to me. But perhaps a SWANK server running standalone in an application can be viewed as a library. Then again, it's tricky, why would developers need to place two similar separate debugging tools in their applications?
Do you really see this as an impediment to trying out SLY? SLY is alpha right now (as noted before) and I mostly need feedback. When I get some feedback I will consider the ability to load both SLY and SWANK servers in the same Lisp. I probably won't release sly until the time Emacs 24.4 officially comes out (it's in pretest right now)
João