7 May
2004
7 May
'04
9:42 p.m.
Barry Fishman <barry_fishman@att.net> writes:
On clisp-devel I got the response.
Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org> writes:
Please patch Slime to work with this because this is what the next release will print.
OK, SLIME is patched. BTW, SLIME's backtrace for CLISP is, um, not very useful. CLISP's native backtrace seems to be more informative, especially, it includes frames for compiled functions. Is there a way to improve the current situation? Helmut.