21 Nov
2009
21 Nov
'09
9:14 p.m.
On Nov 17, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
At the moment, the Clojure backend does not correctly implement parsing the protocol.
Last time I looked into the Clojure implementation of swank, it apparently rely on a number of expectations that easily might be broken by a swank client, such as that essential symbols are passed in lowercase. Maybe they could be helped by a more rigidly defined protocol, like a strict syntax for swank symbols that the Clojure backend developers and others could use to ensure compatibility.
-- Terje Norderhaug