Re: [slime-devel] Patch for slime-load-file

* Matthias Koeppe [2005-12-03 20:43+0100] writes:

I see, this is what I suspected. As Edi Weitz pointed out, the various Lisp implementations use several default source extensions, so it is not easy to decide which source file can be loaded without specifying the extension. Therefore, I have revised my approach to improve slime-load-file. What do you think of this change?

Hmm, that's now rather complicated. I think it would be simpler and better to always keep the file extension. Those people who know that the command just boils down to CL:LOAD can still delete the extension manually, beginners aren't confused, and we don't have to document this minor feature.

Helmut.