4 Dec
2003
4 Dec
'03
10:47 p.m.
Luke Gorrie <luke@bluetail.com> writes:
Now we've also added a command that goes to the next definition (like M-, in etags) on `C-M-.'.
Hmm, well, etags has C-M-. as `find-tag-regexp'. Conceivably we could do a command like that too.
Whaddayareckon, can we push through a rebellion against etags bindings, or is resistance futile (and annoying)?
If it bugs me enough (i.e. I actually start using slime for all my lisp stuff and the keybindings bug me) I'll submit a patch for an option variable, e.g. slime-mimic-etags, which could be set to t automatically whenever emacs-nit-picker was t :-) P.S: My first priority in making myself athome in slime is something else, see my next post.