9 Dec
2009
9 Dec
'09
12:05 a.m.
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Helmut Eller heller@common-lisp.netwrote:
- Elliott Slaughter [2009-12-08 01:21+0100] writes:
When I try 0 as timeout, I get this error:
The assertion (OR (NOT SWANK::TIMEOUT) (EQ SWANK::TIMEOUT T)) failed.
When I use t as timeout, it does basically what I want, but I'd rather
have
the timeout be immediate (no wait). Is there any way to do this?
Sorry, the argument should indeed be T and not 0. T means "nowait" and NIL means wait indefinetly.
Thanks. Works like a charm, even on Windows/SBCL :-)
--
Elliott Slaughter
"Don't worry about what anybody else is going to do. The best way to predict
the future is to invent it." - Alan Kay