"Marco Baringer" mb@bese.it writes:
frederic.gobry@epfl.ch (Frédéric Gobry) writes:
try using #'swank:swank-debugger-hook instead.
Is it ok to pass nil as the "hook" argument? So far, the hook seems not to be used, but this does not tell me what I should put there to be safe :)
the hook argument to swank-debugger-hook is ignored, so pass whatever you want.
why don't we just remove the argument if it's ignored? are we sure it sholud be ignored?
If we're offering the possibility of using swank-debugger-hook as CL:*DEBUGGER-HOOK*, then it needs to be a function of two arguments.
*DEBUGGER-HOOK* is bound to nil when calling the current debugger hook; it may be necessary to introduce (let ((*debugger-hook* hook)) ...) around debugger hook activities that may invoke the debugger...
Cheers,
Christophe