31 Jul
2004
31 Jul
'04
11:18 a.m.
Thomas Schilling tjs_ng@yahoo.de writes:
What do you think of the current style of making it a xref add-on? Would you prefer a stand-alone gf browser buffer? (or do you have no opinion on this issue?)
I don't use CLOS, so I don't have much need or thought about this feature. It might be easier to have a separate command instead of using M-. directly; something like the who-* commands, i.e. use the xref buffer but call a different Swank function. That probably needs a only little bit more code than the current variant but would be more orthogonal.
Helmut.