14 Apr
2005
14 Apr
'05
7:28 a.m.
Zach Beane writes:
This setup has worked very well for me so far.
That's essentially my setup, too. I have a couple different SBCL processes images jailed in different places, so I have them listening on different ports (4005,6,7...). One thing that's kind of a gotcha is that normally Swank uses two ports, one for Emacs->SBCL communication, and one for SBCL->Emacs stuff. If you set swank:*use-dedicated-output-stream* to nil, all Swank communication will happen over the forwarded port.