* Stas Boukarev 87eim25fsh.fsf@gmail.com : Wrote on Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:13:18 +0300:
| Madhu enometh@meer.net writes: | |> * "Tobias C. Rittweiler" 87bph7i8va.fsf@freebits.de : |> Wrote on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:52:09 +0100: |> |> | |> | Ok these fail because ARGLIST calls REPLACE-STRINGS-WITH-SYMBOLS in |> | Lispworks swank-backend -- and that function turns the "Retry." |> | initform into a symbol. |> |> I have been using LWL-5.1 Pers without REPLACE-STRINGS-WITH-SYMBOLS and |> have not encountered any problem that REPLACE-STRINGS-WITH-SYMBOLS |> solves. |> |> Is there a test case which fails if REPLACE-STRINGS-WITH-SYMBOLS is not |> used? |> | flet
That does not help. Can you please provide a test case? I use flets all the time and I dont use your REPLACE-STRINGS-WITH-SYMBOLS function, and I haven't seen a problem.
-- Madhu
Madhu enometh@meer.net writes:
- Stas Boukarev 87eim25fsh.fsf@gmail.com :
Wrote on Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:13:18 +0300:
| Madhu enometh@meer.net writes: | |> * "Tobias C. Rittweiler" 87bph7i8va.fsf@freebits.de : |> Wrote on Wed, 06 Jan 2010 15:52:09 +0100: |> |> | |> | Ok these fail because ARGLIST calls REPLACE-STRINGS-WITH-SYMBOLS in |> | Lispworks swank-backend -- and that function turns the "Retry." |> | initform into a symbol. |> |> I have been using LWL-5.1 Pers without REPLACE-STRINGS-WITH-SYMBOLS and |> have not encountered any problem that REPLACE-STRINGS-WITH-SYMBOLS |> solves. |> |> Is there a test case which fails if REPLACE-STRINGS-WITH-SYMBOLS is not |> used? |> | flet
That does not help. Can you please provide a test case? I use flets all the time and I dont use your REPLACE-STRINGS-WITH-SYMBOLS function, and I haven't seen a problem.
I guess you don't use the slime-autodoc contrib? That one structurally analyzes the return value of ARGLIST, and is hence bitten if ARGLIST does not return a valid lambda-list.
-T.
-
Madhu -
Tobias C. Rittweiler