Re: [slime-devel] M-. slime-edit-definition accuracy
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Luke J Crook wrote:
Andras Simon wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Luke Crook wrote:
I'm using Emacs/SLIME and Lispworks. I'm finding that "M-. slime-edit- definition" becomes less and less accurate the further into the file the definition is located. Can't this be due to Windows/Unix eol differences? Just guessing.
I suppose it could very well be. Is there anyone using Win32 that has experienced this problem?
Just convert the file to use the eol convention of your OS, recompile it, and see if the problem persists. Andras
I have that trouble as well with files that are Windows native - created only on Windows. It's a Slime quirk I've just been living with because I haven't had the time to dig and figure out what's going on. On 12/9/05, Andras Simon <andras@renyi.hu> wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Luke J Crook wrote:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Luke Crook wrote:
I'm using Emacs/SLIME and Lispworks. I'm finding that "M-. slime-edit- definition" becomes less and less accurate the further into the file
Andras Simon wrote: the
definition is located. Can't this be due to Windows/Unix eol differences? Just guessing.
I suppose it could very well be. Is there anyone using Win32 that has experienced this problem?
Just convert the file to use the eol convention of your OS, recompile it, and see if the problem persists.
Andras _______________________________________________ slime-devel site list slime-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel
Tom Pierce <t.pierce <at> computer.org> writes:
I have that trouble as well with files that are Windows native - created only
on Windows. It's a Slime quirk I've just been living with because I haven't had the time to dig and figure out what's going on. OK, good it's not just me then. Thanks for the confirmation. -Luke
participants (3)
-
Andras Simon -
Luke Crook -
Tom Pierce