[slime-devel] Who uses slime-complete-form (C-c C-s)?
I'd like to remove C-c C-s. This would remove a good chunk of code, and would make some other code more straightforward. Disclaimer: I do use C-c C-s myself to automatically insert the situation keywords for EVAL-WHEN forms but I could live without that. -T.
FWIW, I'd like to register a vote to keep C-c C-s. On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler<tcr@freebits.de> wrote:
I'd like to remove C-c C-s. This would remove a good chunk of code, and would make some other code more straightforward.
Disclaimer: I do use C-c C-s myself to automatically insert the situation keywords for EVAL-WHEN forms but I could live without that.
-T.
_______________________________________________ slime-devel site list slime-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/mailman/listinfo/slime-devel
On Sábado 11 Julio 2009, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
I'd like to remove C-c C-s. This would remove a good chunk of code, and would make some other code more straightforward.
Disclaimer: I do use C-c C-s myself to automatically insert the situation keywords for EVAL-WHEN forms but I could live without that.
-T.
I mostly find myself pressing C-c C-s when the arglist doesn't fit in a single line at the bottom of the window, whatever it's called in emacs slang. Recently though, that has only resulted in a "Could not generate completion for form ..." message. G
On Jul 11, 2009, at 10:37 AM, Gábor Melis wrote:
On Sábado 11 Julio 2009, Tobias C. Rittweiler wrote:
I'd like to remove C-c C-s. This would remove a good chunk of code, and would make some other code more straightforward.
Disclaimer: I do use C-c C-s myself to automatically insert the situation keywords for EVAL-WHEN forms but I could live without that.
I mostly find myself pressing C-c C-s when the arglist doesn't fit in a single line at the bottom of the window, whatever it's called in emacs slang. Recently though, that has only resulted in a "Could not generate completion for form ..." message.
Consider upgrading to the latest version. After July 2, Swank no longer inserts newlines in the arglist. The consequence is that if you resize the width of your editor window, most arglists will fit on a single line, at least without prematurely breaking the line. +2009-07-02 Terje Norderhaug <terje@in-progress.com> + + * swank.lisp (operator-arglist): Don't use pprint-fill + for people with wide screens. -- Terje Norderhaug
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler<tcr@freebits.de> wrote:
I'd like to remove C-c C-s. This would remove a good chunk of code, and would make some other code more straightforward.
Please don't. It is essential for me. Matthias -- Matthias Koeppe -- http://www.math.ucdavis.edu/~mkoeppe
Am 11.07.2009 um 20:13 schrieb Matthias Koeppe: On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:46 AM, Tobias C. Rittweiler<tcr@freebits.de> wrote:
I'd like to remove C-c C-s. This would remove a good chunk of code, and would make some other code more straightforward.
Please don't. It is essential for me. Matthias SAME FOR ME. Please don't. Thanks. Frank -- Frank Goenninger Cell: +49 175 4321058 E-Mail: frgo@me.com
participants (6)
-
David Neu -
Frank Goenninger -
Gábor Melis -
Matthias Koeppe -
Terje Norderhaug -
Tobias C. Rittweiler